Roof insurance claims, from the homeowner’s side

This is a description of how claims generally work, not an opinion on yours. Your policy is the document that decides your claim, and your state insurance department is the authority on what your insurer is obliged to do.

In Rancho Santa Margarita the failure that leads is sudden dry winds that test every lifted edge on the roof, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. Dry offshore wind lifts material that damp coastal air had been holding down. Most wind losses here happen on a handful of nights a year. The radar record for this area is on the storm page, with the dates — worth having in front of you, because the date of the event is the first thing an insurer asks for.

The order things happen in

There are roughly seven steps and they do not reorder. Document the damage. Make it safe. Report it to the insurer. Meet the adjuster. Receive a scope and an estimate. Have the work done. Submit proof of completion if your policy holds back depreciation until then. Every step depends on the one before it having been done properly, which is why the first one — photographs, before anything is touched — carries more weight than it looks like it should.

Homeowners tend to think the adjuster visit is the decisive moment. It is not. The decisive moment is the hour after the storm, when the evidence either gets recorded or does not.

What to gather, and when

Take four times as many pictures as feel necessary and make sure the dates are intact — most phones record this automatically, and it is worth checking rather than assuming. Include something for scale in the close shots. Photograph the gutters, the vent caps and the downspouts as well as the roof itself, because soft metal records an impact more legibly than a shingle does.

Alongside the photographs, keep a plain written note of what happened and when: the date and rough time of the storm, when you first noticed the damage, who you called and what they said. A dated contemporaneous note is worth a great deal more than a recollection three months later.

Worth having in one folder before the adjuster arrives:

• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe
• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• Your policy declarations page, showing the deductible and the settlement basis
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to

The inspection, from the adjuster’s side

They will typically mark out a test square — often ten feet by ten feet — on each slope and count the impacts inside it, because a count per square is how the trade decides whether a slope is damaged enough to warrant replacing rather than repairing. They will check the gutters, the vents, the flashing, the ridge and the soft metal, and they will look at the slopes the weather did not reach as a control.

They are also assessing whether the roof was in serviceable condition beforehand. Missing shingles from an earlier storm that was never claimed, obvious prior patching, or a roof visibly at the end of its life all weaken a claim, because they make it harder to attribute the damage to one dated event.

What counts as fraud, plainly stated

It is worth being unromantic about why this matters to you specifically rather than in the abstract. A fraudulent claim can be denied and rescinded years later, the policy can be voided, the amount can be reclaimed, and the record follows you to every insurer afterwards. The contractor who proposed it has none of that exposure and has usually left the state.

If somebody suggests any of it, that is the end of the conversation with that company, and it is worth telling your insurer that the offer was made.

Emergency repairs, tarps and the receipts nobody keeps

Do what is necessary to stop water entering, spend no more than that, keep every receipt and photograph the work both before and after. Those four things together turn mitigation from an expense into a documented, reimbursable part of the claim, and they take about an extra ten minutes.

If a contractor does the emergency work, get a separate written invoice for it rather than folding it into the main job. Separated out, it is straightforward to claim; buried in a re-roof invoice, it usually is not.

Two settlement bases, and the difference is most of the cheque

There are two ways a policy can pay. Replacement cost value pays what it costs to put the roof back today. Actual cash value pays that same figure minus depreciation for the age and condition of the roof — and on a roof two-thirds of the way through its life, depreciation can be most of the money. Which one you have is written on your declarations page, and it is worth knowing before you file rather than after.

This one line in the policy is usually the difference between a claim that pays for a roof and a claim that pays for part of one. It is not negotiable after the fact; it is what you bought.

The deductible, and the thing no honest contractor will offer

Your deductible is your share of the loss, and it is a term of the contract rather than a suggestion. It is worth being blunt about what follows from that: a contractor who offers to waive it, absorb it, discount it, "work with you on it", eat it, or cover it with a rebate or a free upgrade is proposing insurance fraud, and in most states that is a criminal offence for both of you. It is prosecuted in roofing more than in any other trade, precisely because the offer is made so often after storms.

The mechanism is straightforward and so is the illegality: the contractor bills the insurer for the full amount while collecting less than the full amount from you, which means the invoice sent to the insurer is false. The homeowner who agreed to it is a party to that. No amount of friendly framing on a doorstep changes what it is.

Repair, replace, and the matching problem

A partial approval is not a denial, and it is not final either. If your contractor’s scope and the adjuster’s scope differ, the route forward is a written, itemised comparison of the two — line by line, with photographs attached to the lines that differ — sent to the insurer with a request for re-inspection. Insurers revise scopes routinely when given something specific to revise against. They revise nothing in response to a phone call expressing dissatisfaction.

Ask the contractor for their scope in the same format the insurer uses, item by item with quantities. Two documents in the same shape can be compared. A quote that is one number and a paragraph cannot be.

The clock, in both directions

Two clocks run and only one of them is obvious. The visible one is how long the insurer takes: most states set regulatory deadlines for acknowledging a claim, for deciding it, and for paying once it is accepted, and these are usually counted in days rather than months. Your state insurance department publishes the actual numbers, and they are enforceable.

The other clock is yours, and it is the one that ends claims. Policies require prompt notice of a loss and set an outer limit on how long after the event you can report it. Damage discovered late — hail in particular, because it hides — is denied on this basis more often than on any question about the damage itself.

What to do when the answer is no

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

In short

Document first, make it safe second, report third, and get the scope in writing before anybody starts work. In that order it usually goes smoothly. In any other order it usually does not.